Post by The Curmudgeon on Sept 20, 2009 16:59:07 GMT 2
With the news that there are now Super Serious, No Really We Mean It This Time talks in place regarding the illegal file sharing of music (in the UK at least, don't the US already charge you if they catch you?), I thought I'd share this post with you. It's a pretty decent, non-preachy read.
www.nme.com/blog/index.php?blog=10&p=7136&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Now, while people prattle on about how music is "too expensive" and if "they lowered the cost of CDs I would buy them", I always come back with the fact that music has never BEEN cheaper than it is now. In the UK, top ten albums can go for as little as £7.99 now (in fact, just today I saw the album by UK pop starlet Little Boots, still in the top 10, for just £5) When you consider a pack of cigarettes now costs more than £5.00, something people buy EVERY fucking day, the cost of a lovingly crafted, expensively produced piece of music that will last forever doesn't seem so out of the question.
Yet we have bred a generation of people who just will not pay for it, and are happy to basically own NO music other than the mp3's on their computer. As awesome as Charlie Brooker is, he's talking out his ass if he thinks people who simply steal music "bloody love it", because I've talked to people who have downloaded albums and they can't even name the fucking thing.
The Beatles made the news this week because they re-released every album, remastered, for the first time ever, and four of those albums charted in the top 10. So it seems there ARE still millions of people willing to pay for real, physical copies of music, it's just a shame it's music they probably already own.
So, bonus content for people buying the real thing or penalties for people stealing it? What would YOU do?
www.nme.com/blog/index.php?blog=10&p=7136&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1
Now, while people prattle on about how music is "too expensive" and if "they lowered the cost of CDs I would buy them", I always come back with the fact that music has never BEEN cheaper than it is now. In the UK, top ten albums can go for as little as £7.99 now (in fact, just today I saw the album by UK pop starlet Little Boots, still in the top 10, for just £5) When you consider a pack of cigarettes now costs more than £5.00, something people buy EVERY fucking day, the cost of a lovingly crafted, expensively produced piece of music that will last forever doesn't seem so out of the question.
Yet we have bred a generation of people who just will not pay for it, and are happy to basically own NO music other than the mp3's on their computer. As awesome as Charlie Brooker is, he's talking out his ass if he thinks people who simply steal music "bloody love it", because I've talked to people who have downloaded albums and they can't even name the fucking thing.
The Beatles made the news this week because they re-released every album, remastered, for the first time ever, and four of those albums charted in the top 10. So it seems there ARE still millions of people willing to pay for real, physical copies of music, it's just a shame it's music they probably already own.
So, bonus content for people buying the real thing or penalties for people stealing it? What would YOU do?