|
|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Aug 18, 2010 13:15:20 GMT 2
We don't really get Rolling Stone magazine over here, so their covers and features really have to be something major to get our attention. And sometimes they do..   And my one time fave..  Have you seen this months, though? I think we may have a new champ.. www.comicbookmovie.com/fansites/rorschachsrants/news/?a=21616I wouldn't be shocked if some stores refused to sell that. It's glorious. |
|
|
|
Post by trashcanman on Aug 18, 2010 20:05:47 GMT 2
I read it for the articles.
Riiiiiiiight.
That publication is only good for covers like those. I wouldn't wipe my ass with their music reviews, the interviews are inane, and the articles are so fucking incessantly politically biased that Michael Moore thinks they need to tone it down. God, I hate Rolling Stone.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Aug 18, 2010 20:19:53 GMT 2
See, I've never even read it. We do get it over here, but only in really huge newsagents and it's always really expensive. I've flicked through it a couple of times and it does seem a bit.. dull. UK music mags are always pretty light-hearted and funny (except when neccessary).
So it sucks that bad, huh? That's a shame. It's always, like, THE music magazine people talk about. Only the NME in the UK has a longer history.
|
|
|
|
Post by trashcanman on Aug 19, 2010 22:21:02 GMT 2
It's as much of a music magazine as MTV is a music video channel. It's primarily 50-50 a celebrity worship rag and left-wing news publication. And not good left-wing, either. But I do love some sexy photo shoots.
|
|
