|
Post by trashcanman on Nov 18, 2010 21:28:33 GMT 2
Holy fuck. So now they are pitting toddlers against one another to see which one is the worst child ever? Are they seriously starting in on these people that young? I can get snapping and publishing pictures of celebrity children, but treating them like they are Paris fucking Hilton the instant they obtain the ability to speak is a bit much. Guys, I'm sure these tiny tots will one day grow up to be spoiled cokewhores who earn every bit of abuse and derision they get. Is it so wrong that I think the tabloids should wait until then to assassinate their characters?
|
|
|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Nov 19, 2010 19:16:52 GMT 2
Jesus. You know, MJ, as nuts as he was, had the sense the cover up his kids faces because he didn't want the tabloids getting hold of what they looked like and hounding them when they were too young to understand. If a guy as fucked up as Michael Jackson knows that its fundamentaly wrong to have toddlers and children plastered over gossip mags, then you have to wonder at the fucking mentality of these vultures and parasites who think this makes for acceptable material. I shudder to think of the pondlife who would actually consider reading that. So yes - an all new tabloid low.
|
|