|
Post by trashcanman on Feb 6, 2011 3:06:50 GMT 2
Because Katy Perry simply isn't hot enough, am I right? www.thefrisky.com/post/246-gif-of-the-day-katy-perry-gets-photoshopped-by-rolling-stone/Real boobs-fake boobs, real boobs-fake boobs, sock on-sock off, sock on-sock off, human textured skin-alien latex. Ugh. Even the hottest girls on the planet are not hot enough for our bullshit media. Seriously? Now Megan Fox and her like need to feel they don't live up to our increasingly superficial beauty standards anymore. Stuff like this makes me happy that I will never, ever buy another magazine for as long as I live.
|
|
|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Feb 8, 2011 4:49:30 GMT 2
"Yes, let's make Katy Perry sexier by moving her fingers out. Because THAT's what people will be looking at."
I'm actually surprised Rolling Stone are responsible for this. Some bullshit fashion/gossip mag I could expect it from, but Rolling Stone? Aren't they, like, respectable?
|
|
|
Post by trashcanman on Feb 8, 2011 6:09:11 GMT 2
Not for quite some time. RS is a terrible publication. Used to be a cool music mag, but now it's all obnoxious left-wing politics and celebrity gossip along with shitty meaningless CD reviews that they will end up retracting later. They ripped every single Led Zeppelin album when it came out and then later posted 5 star reviews for them decades later as "classic reviews". They initially gave Slipknot's "Iowa" album a deserved 5 stars and called it an instant classic on par with Paranoid and Master of Puppets, then when it didn't tear up the charts they dissed it mere months later. No fucking integrity whatsoever.
|
|