|
|
Post by trashcanman on Mar 28, 2011 12:10:25 GMT 2
I know, stupid question. But I needed to preface the following image somehow so I could share the giggles.  Watson's still too young for my taste and Stewart has been decent in non-twinkly vampire flicks (plus Watson has yet to make out with Dakota Fanning on film), but there's really no argument who has the brighter future as an actress. |
|
|
|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Mar 28, 2011 19:30:03 GMT 2
You know Emma Watson's 20, right? That's too young for you..?
I don't really rate this Stewart girl at all. I haven't seen her in anything (still not seen Twilight), and when does she make out with Dakota Fanning?
So, and this may shock some of you - Emma Watson wins hands DOWN.
(Great pic, by the way)
|
|
|
|
Post by trashcanman on Mar 28, 2011 20:18:51 GMT 2
Thought you'd like that. Actually, I didn't see the last Potter flick so she may well knock my socks off next time I see her. She still looked really young to me. So does Ellen Page. I still love them, mind you, but I'm not madly in lust like others. Stewart played Joan Jett in the Runaways biopic and Fanning (who is younger than either, but she looked fucking HOT in that one, which shocked the hell out of me) played Cherie Currie and they got it on to The Stooges. Really good film. Shitty love scene, but good film.
|
|
