|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Jan 14, 2009 22:19:15 GMT 2
Man, your American music charts baffle me.
Over here, we have one major chart that the media focus on; the UK top 40 (it's actually the UK top 75, but the Top 40 is broadcast on radio). And it's based on sales only. Now, there are other, specialist charts (indie charts, rock charts etc) but the media and general public don't concentrate on them. Nice and simple.
So what the hell is the deal with the US charts? What's the Hot 100? And then there's the Airplay Charts (I think) and.. I don't get it. Some charts are based on airplay and not sales?
Explain, please.
|
|
|
Post by trashcanman on Jan 14, 2009 22:28:31 GMT 2
I don't know and I don't care. It's all fucking advertising and payola as far as I'm concerned. There is a chart for alternative rock and another for modern rock. It's mostly the exact same songs but they are in a different order. I DARE somebody to explain that stupidity.
|
|
|
Post by Benjamin Haines on Jan 15, 2009 8:08:46 GMT 2
The Billboard Top 200 is ranked by album sales and updated weekly.
I couldn't tell you about the gazillion others.
|
|
|
Post by The Curmudgeon on Jan 15, 2009 23:07:54 GMT 2
See, it came to my attention when I read that Britney Spears was number one in the.. I dunno, Hot 100 or whatever, for the first time EVER. That's what confused me, 'cos surely .. Baby, One More Time was number one.. somewhere in America.
|
|
|
Post by Ben on Jan 26, 2009 2:58:03 GMT 2
The charts are bullshit. Benjamin is right about the Billboard Top 200, but as far as I know the rest of the charts (like Modern Rock top 50, or whatever) are almost always based on airplay.
|
|